Synonym |
(D-Arg0,Hyp3,β-(2-thienyl)Ala58,D-Phe7)-Bradykinin |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
P01023 |
Purity |
Greater than 95% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
Less than 1 EU/μg |
Biological Activity |
Not specified |
Expression System |
Chemical Synthesis |
Fusion Tag |
None |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
1069.2 Da |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.1 μm filtered solution of 20% Acetonitrile and 0.1% TFA |
Reconstitution |
It is recommended to reconstitute the lyophilized
(D-Arg0,Hyp3,β-(2-thienyl)Ala58,D-Phe7)-Bradykinin in sterile 18 MΩ-cm H2O not less than 100
µg/ml, which can then be further diluted to other aqueous solutions. |
Storage & Stability |
Lyophilized product is stable for at least 1 year from the date of receipt when stored at -20°C.
After reconstitution, the product is stable for several weeks at 2-8°C. |
FAQ
What is (D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk and how does it work?
(D-Arg0, Hyp3,
β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk is a synthetic peptide and analog of bradykinin designed to study
the physiological and pharmacological roles of bradykinin receptors. Bradykinin is a naturally occurring
peptide that plays a pivotal role in numerous physiological processes, including inflammation, blood
pressure regulation, and pain signaling. By interacting with specific bradykinin receptors, particularly
B1 and B2 receptors, bradykinin and its analogs can induce a range of biological responses. This analog
is designed to bind with high affinity to these receptors, making it an invaluable tool in biochemical
and pharmacological research for understanding receptor-ligand interactions and the downstream signaling
pathways modulated by bradykinin receptors.
The synthetic modification aims to enhance its
stability and bioavailability, which are typically limiting factors for peptides in therapeutic and
research settings. The inclusion of non-natural amino acids, such as D-Arg, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala, and
D-Phe, enhance the resistance of the peptide to enzymatic degradation, extend its half-life in
biological systems, and sometimes alter its receptor selectivity or efficacy. These modifications not
only allow for prolonged receptor interaction but can also provide insights into how structural elements
of peptide ligands influence receptor signaling.
Research with this analog can elucidate the
nuances of bradykinin-mediated pathways, including its role in vasodilation, nociception, and cellular
signaling in various tissues. Scientists utilize this compound to dissect the complex signaling networks
and potentially discover novel therapeutic targets for diseases where bradykinin signaling is altered,
including cardiovascular diseases, chronic pain conditions, and inflammatory disorders. By studying
these interactions, researchers can develop more targeted and effective interventions that could
modulate bradykinin activity more precisely, highlighting the significance of (D-Arg0, Hyp3,
β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk in advancing both basic and applied sciences.
What are the
potential applications of this bradykinin analog in scientific research?
The potential
applications of (D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk in scientific research are numerous
and varied, largely due to its function as a highly selective and stable bradykinin receptor ligand. One
primary area of application is in the study of cardiovascular function and disease. Bradykinin has known
vasodilatory effects that contribute to blood pressure regulation, and modifications exhibited by this
analog could offer insights into manipulating bradykinin pathways to treat hypertension and related
cardiovascular conditions. By using this analog to modulate bradykinin receptors in experimental models,
researchers can explore the mechanisms behind vasodilation and potentially develop new therapeutic
strategies for cardiovascular diseases.
Another significant application is in inflammation and
nociception research. Bradykinin plays a key role in pain signaling and inflammatory responses, and this
synthetic analog allows scientists to study these processes with greater specificity and stability than
natural bradykinin. By examining how this analog interacts with bradykinin receptors during inflammation
or pain, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of these pathways and their implications in
conditions like arthritis, neuropathic pain, and other chronic inflammatory
diseases.
Additionally, (D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk can be utilized in
cancer research. Bradykinin receptors have been implicated in cancer progression and metastasis, and
this analog allows for the investigation of these roles more precisely. By dissecting the interactions
between bradykinin receptors and cancer cells, researchers can further understand how these pathways
might be targeted for anti-cancer therapies.
Moreover, this analog serves as an important tool in
pharmacological studies aimed at drug development. Understanding the structure-activity relationships of
peptide ligands like this one can inform the design of novel drugs with enhanced specificity and
efficacy. It provides a model for developing new compounds that can either mimic or inhibit natural
peptide functions in a controlled manner. Overall, the bradykinin analog is a versatile and powerful
compound with applications across multiple fields of biomedical research, offering valuable insights
into numerous physiological and pathological processes.
Are there any known limitations or
considerations when using this peptide analog in research?
When using (D-Arg0, Hyp3,
β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk in research, several limitations and considerations must be taken
into account. Although the synthetic modifications enhance its stability and selectivity, researchers
must carefully consider the context of their experiments to ensure accurate interpretation of results.
One such limitation is the potential off-target effects that any modified peptide might have. While the
analog is designed to have high affinity for bradykinin receptors, it's important to confirm specificity
in the chosen biological model. Cross-reactivity with other peptide receptors could lead to unintended
results, complicating the analysis of data and understanding of specific bradykinin-related
pathways.
Another consideration is the experimental setting. Both in vitro and in vivo studies
require carefully optimized conditions to ensure that results are attributable to the action of the
analog itself rather than external factors. In vitro studies necessitate controlled environments where
factors such as peptide concentration, receptor expression levels, and interaction times are tightly
regulated. In vivo studies introduce further complexity, including the need to consider bioavailability,
distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the peptide. Differences in animal models, such as
species-specific variations in receptor subtype expression or signalling pathways, can affect the
generalizability of results and must be accounted for in the design and interpretation of
experiments.
The solubility and delivery of this analog also pose practical challenges.
Researchers need a suitable vehicle for administration, especially in in vivo settings, wherein
solubility and stability must be maintained to ensure efficient delivery to the target site.
Additionally, the synthesis and purification processes for such a modified peptide can be
resource-intensive, requiring specialized equipment and expertise to produce it in sufficient quantity
and purity for research purposes.
Furthermore, in interpreting results, researchers should be
aware of the limitations of their experimental design and the possibility of unforeseen interactions
within complex biological systems. Results obtained from this analog must be corroborated with
complementary approaches, such as genetic manipulation or bioinformatics analyses, to build a
comprehensive understanding of bradykinin receptor function.
In conclusion, while (D-Arg0, Hyp3,
β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk provides a powerful tool for bradykinin receptor research,
researchers must consider and address these limitations and ensure careful experimental design and
validation to derive meaningful and accurate scientific insights.
How does the bradykinin analog
compare to natural bradykinin in terms of function and effectiveness?
The bradykinin analog,
(D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk, compares to natural bradykinin in its function and
effectiveness through the lens of its design enhancements aimed at improving stability, specificity, and
receptor interaction. Natural bradykinin, a potent endogenous peptide, mediates several physiological
effects, including vasodilation, smooth muscle contraction, and pain signaling. However, its short
half-life and rapid degradation by proteases in the body limit its utility in both research and
therapeutic contexts.
By contrast, the synthetic analog incorporates strategic modifications to
overcome these limitations. The inclusion of non-natural amino acids in the analog significantly
enhances its resistance to enzymatic degradation, thereby extending its biological half-life. This
increased stability allows for prolonged receptor engagement compared to natural bradykinin, providing a
consistent and sustained activation of the bradykinin receptors. As a result, researchers can explore
the kinetics and dynamics of receptor-mediated pathways more comprehensively.
In terms of
receptor selectivity and affinity, the analog is designed to possess high specificity towards the B1 and
B2 subtypes of bradykinin receptors. While natural bradykinin also targets these receptors, the
structural modifications in the analog can confer differential affinities, which may help delineate
receptor subtype-specific effects and signaling pathways that are challenging to discern with native
peptides. This enhanced specificity makes the analog a valuable tool for investigating nuanced
physiological roles of the bradykinin system, potentially leading to discoveries that natural bradykinin
alone might not elucidate.
Moreover, the analog's modifications sometimes result in altered
potency or efficacy compared to natural bradykinin, offering insights into the structural basis of
receptor-ligand interaction and how specific residues contribute to the biological activity. Such
knowledge is instrumental for drug discovery efforts, as understanding these interactions aids in the
rational design of new pharmacological agents targeting bradykinin pathways with improved efficacy and
safety profiles.
However, despite these advantages, it's important to note that the analog might
not fully recapitulate all the biological functions of natural bradykinin due to its structural
deviations. Consequently, while the analog serves as a robust tool for specific mechanistic studies,
researchers should be cautious when extrapolating its effects to natural physiological scenarios. In
summary, the bradykinin analog offers distinct functional benefits over natural bradykinin, particularly
in stability and receptor targeting, but must be used with an understanding of its limitations in
faithfully mimicking all aspects of natural peptide function.
Can this synthetic bradykinin
analog contribute to the development of new therapeutic interventions?
The synthetic bradykinin
analog (D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk holds significant potential for contributing
to the development of new therapeutic interventions, primarily through its insights into bradykinin
receptor functions and signaling pathways. The design of this analog allows for precise targeting and
modulation of bradykinin receptors, which are integral to many physiological processes and pathological
conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, pain, and inflammation.
One potential therapeutic
avenue where this analog might contribute is in the treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular
disorders. Bradykinin is known for its role in vasodilation and blood pressure regulation. By using the
analog to explore these pathways, researchers can identify novel targets for drug development that
modulate these effects more effectively than current treatments. The stability and specificity of the
analog make it an ideal investigative tool for uncovering new aspects of bradykinin-mediated
vasodilation, potentially leading to innovative therapies that leverage these pathways for managing
blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular complications.
Similarly, in the realm of pain
management and inflammatory diseases, this analog provides a way to dissect the complex interplay of
bradykinin in nociceptive signaling and inflammatory responses. Understanding these interactions in
greater detail could enable the development of new analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs that
specifically target bradykinin pathways, offering relief for patients with conditions like arthritis or
chronic pain syndromes without the side effects often associated with traditional pain
medications.
Furthermore, the analog could facilitate advancements in cancer treatment.
Bradykinin receptors have roles in tumor proliferation and metastasis, and the study of this analog can
yield insights into how modulating these receptors affects cancer progression. This could result in new
therapeutic strategies that target bradykinin receptor pathways to halt cancer growth or
spread.
The design of this analog also contributes to the fundamental understanding needed for
rational drug design. Insights gained from researching its interactions can inform the development of
drugs with improved pharmacological profiles. By understanding the precise receptor-ligand dynamics and
the structural factors influencing receptor specificity and efficacy, researchers can create more
targeted treatments with fewer off-target effects.
In summary, while direct therapeutic
applications of (D-Arg0, Hyp3, β-(2-thienyl)-Ala5–8, D-Phe7)-Bradyk may be limited by its
research-oriented design, its contributions to scientific knowledge and understanding of bradykinin
receptor pathways have the potential to revolutionize therapeutic strategies across various fields,
offering promising new directions for future drug development and treatment paradigms.