Synonym |
Delta-MSH |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
POMC |
Purity |
≥ 95% |
Endotoxin Level |
< 1.0 EU per μg |
Biological Activity |
N/A |
Expression System |
E. coli |
Fusion Tag |
None |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
3.1 kDa |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in Acetonitrile and TFA |
Reconstitution |
Centrifuge vial before opening. Reconstitute in 10 mM Sodium Phosphate, pH 7.5 to a
concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/ml. |
Storage & Stability |
Store at -20°C upon receipt. Stable for up to 6 months at -20°C. |
FAQ
What is δ-MSH, and how does it work in the human body?
δ-MSH, or Delta-Melanocyte Stimulating
Hormone, is a peptide hormone that is primarily known for its role in skin pigmentation. It is a member
of the melanocortin family, which includes other hormones such as α-MSH and β-MSH. These hormones are
products of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene and are involved in various physiological processes.
δ-MSH is produced in the pituitary gland and acts on the melanocortin receptors, particularly the MC1R
(melanocortin 1 receptor), which is predominantly found in melanocytes, the cells responsible for
pigmentation in the skin and hair. By binding to MC1R, δ-MSH stimulates the production of melanin, the
pigment that gives skin, hair, and eyes their color. This process is called melanogenesis.
Beyond
pigmentation, δ-MSH and its interaction with melanocortin receptors have several other biological
implications. Melanocortin receptors are distributed throughout the body, including in the brain,
adipose tissue, and immune cells, suggesting that δ-MSH could influence a variety of systems. In
addition to influencing pigmentation, δ-MSH has been studied for its potential roles in
anti-inflammatory responses, regulation of appetite, and energy homeostasis. Its anti-inflammatory
properties arise from its ability to target specific pathways and modulate immune responses, which may
help in reducing inflammation associated with certain autoimmune conditions.
Research has also
indicated that δ-MSH may be involved in the body's response to stress, as melanocortin peptides are
implicated in the stress axis and stress-induced physiological changes. Furthermore, due to the
widespread presence of its receptors, δ-MSH may influence the central nervous system, potentially
affecting mood and behavior, although the exact mechanisms and implications of these effects require
further scientific investigation. Overall, while δ-MSH is traditionally recognized for its role in
pigmentation, its multifunctional nature highlights the complexity and interconnectivity of hormonal
regulation in the body.
What are the potential therapeutic applications of δ-MSH?
δ-MSH is
gaining attention in various research fields due to its broad range of potential therapeutic
applications, driven by its ability to interact with melanocortin receptors which are involved in
critical physiological processes. One of the most notable avenues of exploration is in the treatment of
skin-related conditions. Given its role in stimulating melanin production, δ-MSH is being studied for
its potential use in conditions like vitiligo, a disorder characterized by depigmented patches of skin.
By enhancing melanin synthesis, δ-MSH could help restore pigmentation in affected individuals, offering
a new avenue for treatment beyond traditional methods like phototherapy or topical
steroids.
Apart from its dermatological applications, δ-MSH’s influence on inflammation positions
it as a candidate for treating inflammatory diseases. In particular, researchers are exploring its
utility in managing autoimmune conditions where chronic inflammation is a core issue. By modulating
immune responses, δ-MSH might offer a pathway to reduce inflammation without the severe side effects
associated with long-term use of conventional anti-inflammatory drugs like
corticosteroids.
δ-MSH’s role in regulating appetite and energy homeostasis also presents
potential therapeutic applications in tackling obesity and metabolic disorders. The peptide’s effect on
appetite suppression could be harnessed to develop treatments that help manage weight by reducing food
intake and promoting satiety. Moreover, due to its action on the melanocortin receptors involved in
metabolism, δ-MSH could aid in enhancing metabolic rate and thus help manage or prevent obesity,
diabetes, and other related metabolic conditions.
Moreover, δ-MSH is of interest in the
neurological field due to its potential neuroprotective roles. It might assist in protecting neurons
from damage in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. While research is in the
early stages, the potential for δ-MSH in these areas warrants further investigation, as it could lead to
breakthroughs in how such conditions are managed. The hormone's ability to modulate neural pathways
could also mean it has potential applications in mental health, particularly in conditions linked with
stress and mood regulation.
Is δ-MSH safe for therapeutic use, and what are the potential side
effects?
The safety profile of δ-MSH for therapeutic use is a significant consideration that
researchers and healthcare professionals are investigating. As of now, δ-MSH is primarily still within
the experimental and research phases, especially concerning its application in humans. Initial studies
and trials are pivotal in determining both its efficacy and safety margins across different potential
therapeutic applications. It's essential to approach any hormone or peptide therapy with a careful
understanding of its interactions, potential benefits, and side effects.
In current research and
trials, δ-MSH has shown promise with relatively favorable safety indices, particularly when used in
controlled environments. However, as with any biologically active peptide, there is potential for side
effects, which researchers continue to evaluate. Common concerns when it comes to peptide hormones like
δ-MSH include their potential to affect off-target sites due to the wide distribution of receptors
across various body systems. This widespread receptor presence means that while δ-MSH might be
beneficial for specific conditions, it could also unintentionally affect other systems, leading to side
effects.
Potential side effects noted in studies include local reactions at the site of
administration, which is common with peptide therapies, and can include redness or swelling. More
systemic side effects depend on the area of application, for instance, affecting appetite, which might
not be desired in individuals without metabolic disorders. Also, as δ-MSH can influence pigmentation,
there could be unintended changes in skin tone, which although generally reversible, may not be desired
cosmetically.
Furthermore, the immunomodulatory effects, while beneficial for conditions like
autoimmune diseases, could pose a risk if they disturb the normal immune balance, potentially leading to
an increased risk of infections or other immune complications. It is critical for complete clinical
trials to occur to ascertain the long-term effects and establish firm safety guidelines for δ-MSH’s
therapeutic use. These trials would help identify which patient populations would benefit the most from
δ-MSH therapy and under what conditions it can be safely administered.
How does δ-MSH compare
with other melanocyte stimulating hormones in terms of activity and function?
δ-MSH, like other
members of the melanocyte-stimulating hormone family such as α-MSH and β-MSH, plays a crucial role in
regulating pigmentation and is involved in several physiological processes through the activation of
melanocortin receptors. However, each of these hormones has unique characteristics concerning their
activity and function, influenced by their specific binding affinities and receptor distribution. δ-MSH
is particularly interesting due to its distinct role among the MSH peptides, partly due to its different
receptor binding profiles and its specific physiological outcomes.
Among the MSH peptides, α-MSH
is the most studied and known for its potent activity in inducing melanogenesis, primarily through
binding to the MC1R on melanocytes. This binding promotes increased melanin production, which is
instrumental in pigmentation. α-MSH also has pronounced anti-inflammatory and anorexigenic effects,
acting on multiple receptors spread across various body tissues. On the other hand, β-MSH, while also
involved in pigmentation, is less potent than α-MSH and has other roles in energy homeostasis and the
regulation of the adrenal cortex's activity.
δ-MSH, although sharing similar pathways and
receptor interactions, has a different focus of activity. Its affinity for melanocortin receptors varies
compared to α- and β-MSH. These differences can lead to varied biological responses, which are a subject
of interest in ongoing research. One of the unique aspects of δ-MSH is its involvement in inflammatory
processes. It appears to modulate certain inflammatory pathways potentially more effectively than its
counterparts, presenting opportunities for targeted therapies where inflammation is a significant
clinical problem.
In terms of functional scope, δ-MSH may not stimulate pigmentation as strongly
as α-MSH but might offer a more balanced profile concerning its other roles. Researchers are
particularly interested in δ-MSH as potentially providing therapeutic benefits with a possibly better
side effect profile in applications where broader hormonal activation might lead to side issues.
Understanding these differences helps in leveraging the unique properties of δ-MSH for therapeutic
applications where other MSH variants might not be as effective or suitable. This comparative analysis
continues to evolve, especially as detailed receptor studies and clinical trials shed more light on the
subtle nuances of each MSH peptide's action.
What are the challenges in developing δ-MSH-based
therapies?
Developing δ-MSH-based therapies presents several challenges that need to be addressed
to ensure safe and effective use. Foremost among these challenges is the complexity of the human
endocrine and immune systems, where δ-MSH interacts with multiple receptors and pathways. This
complexity makes it difficult to predict the outcomes of δ-MSH therapy accurately. Understanding the
intricacies of its interactions with various melanocortin receptors is crucial, as these interactions
will determine both the efficacy of treatment and the potential side effects. Designing therapies that
maximize δ-MSH's beneficial effects while minimizing unintended interactions within the body remains a
significant scientific hurdle.
Another core challenge lies in the delivery mechanisms for
δ-MSH-based therapies. Peptide-based treatments often face difficulties related to their stability and
bioavailability. δ-MSH, being a peptide, is susceptible to degradation by enzymes in the
gastrointestinal tract, meaning oral administration is generally ineffectual. Developing an effective
delivery system, whether through injectable formats, transdermal, or novel drug delivery technologies,
is essential to ensure that δ-MSH is delivered to the sites where it is needed without significant
degradation.
Moreover, the regulatory landscape for new peptide therapies, including δ-MSH, adds
another layer of complexity. Rigorous testing is required to meet safety standards and regulatory
approval, which necessitates significant investment in clinical trials to demonstrate not only efficacy
but also long-term safety. Establishing comprehensive trials that assess the therapeutic index, side
effects, and pharmacokinetics across diverse patient populations is essential for regulatory approval,
demanding substantial time and financial commitments from developing companies.
Finally, there is
a need for a deeper understanding of δ-MSH’s broader systemic effects and potential long-term
consequences. While much research has identified potential benefits, understanding contraindications and
the long-term stability of its effects are crucial. Long-term studies will be paramount in ensuring the
viability and safety of δ-MSH-based therapies, as these will inform best practices and guidelines for
healthcare providers. Overcoming these challenges requires integrated research efforts, collaboration
between academic institutions and pharmaceutical companies, and a concerted effort to advance scientific
understanding and technological capabilities.