Synonym |
Aβ40 |
Species |
Mouse, Rat |
Protein Accession |
P05067 |
Purity |
≥95% by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
<0.1 EU per µg |
Biological Activity |
Not specified |
Expression System |
Escherichia coli |
Fusion Tag |
No tag |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
4.5 kDa |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from 0.22 µm filtered solution in PBS |
Reconstitution |
Centrifuge briefly and dissolve in sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/ml. |
Storage & Stability |
Store at -20°C. Stable for 12 months from the date of receipt. |
FAQ
What is Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) and why is it important in research concerning mice and
rats?
Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) is a peptide fragment derived from the larger amyloid precursor
protein (APP), and it consists of the first 40 amino acids of the amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide. This
particular fragment is significant in research related to neurodegenerative diseases, especially
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). In the brains of mice and rats, similar to humans, the accumulation of these
peptides can play a crucial role in mimicking the pathologies associated with AD, including plaque
formation, synaptic dysfunction, and neurodegeneration.
Researchers often use transgenic mice
and rat models to study the progression and mechanisms of Alzheimer’s diseases. These animal models are
instrumental because they allow scientists to observe the effects of Aβ accumulation over time and
assess the efficacy of potential therapeutic interventions in a biological system that closely resembles
human physiology. The overexpression of amyloid β-protein, particularly forms like Aβ(1-40), leads to
amyloid plaques, similar to those observed in human Alzheimer patients. Thus, it serves as an important
marker for studying the disease’s molecular underpinnings.
Furthermore, Amyloid β-Protein (1-40)
bears importance given its solubility properties and role in the initial stages of plaque formation
which are thought to be less toxic in comparison to its longer counterpart, Amyloid β-Protein (1-42).
Understanding the differences in the pathogenesis and toxicity levels of Aβ(1-40) versus Aβ(1-42) is
crucial for uncovering the detailed mechanisms of AD. By studying Aβ(1-40), researchers aim to elucidate
its individual impact and interaction with other biological molecules within the cerebral environment.
Moreover, Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) can be utilized in in vitro experiments to examine how
external factors, like pharmaceutical agents or gene therapies, might modulate aggregation, toxicity, or
clearance mechanisms. The research conducted with this peptide in rodent models not only aids in
understanding AD but also plays a role in studying general neurodegenerative processes, providing
insights into how misfolded proteins contribute to neuronal death in a wider spectrum of diseases.
Through these studies, Aβ(1-40) acts as a foundational element for advances in both basic neuroscience
and the development of clinical applications for mitigating neurodegenerative diseases.
How do
Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) mouse and rat models contribute to Alzheimer's disease research?
Amyloid
β-Protein (1-40) mouse and rat models are cornerstone tools in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research due to
their ability to emulate many aspects of the human condition. These models are genetically modified to
overexpress APP, thereby producing excess amounts of Aβ peptides including Aβ(1-40), which lead to
plaque formation similar to that observed in human Alzheimer’s patients. This resemblance is key as it
allows researchers to study the progression of AD and its correlation with amyloid plaque pathology in a
controlled environment, with the hope of uncovering both pathogenic mechanisms and potential treatments.
Rodent models facilitate the study of the neuropathological effects of amyloid plaque
accumulation, which includes synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. In these models,
researchers can directly observe and measure impacts on cognitive function through behavioral testing
that assesses learning, memory, and problem-solving capabilities. By comparing these behavioral changes
with biochemical and histological findings, researchers gather insights into how amyloid deposition
correlates with cognitive decline.
Furthermore, these models are essential for analyzing the
interactions between amyloid β proteins and other pathological hallmark proteins, such as tau, under
conditions of neurodegeneration. The interplay between amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles is a
critical aspect of Alzheimer’s pathology, and understanding this relationship through rodent models can
help identify points of therapeutic intervention that may halt or slow the development of these
aggregates.
The use of Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) models is also pivotal in testing novel
therapeutic approaches. For instance, researchers can deliver pharmacological compounds to these animals
and assess their ability to reduce amyloid burden or improve cognitive function. Genetic modifications
or drug treatments applied to these models offer practical insights into whether the therapeutic
pathways may be beneficial in clinical trials with human subjects.
Additionally, these models
contribute to research concerning the basic biology of amyloids, such as how they fold, aggregate, and
are cleared by the cellular machinery. Understanding these basic processes in rodent models offers
crucial insights that can later be translated to human research. They also provide a platform for
exploring the impact of environmental factors, like diet and stress, on amyloidogenesis and AD
progression.
Through the combination of behavioral, biochemical, and genetic approaches, Amyloid
β-Protein (1-40) rodent models remain invaluable in Alzheimer’s research. They are not only instrumental
in elucidating the pathophysiology of AD but also serve as a bridge to clinical applications, helping to
narrow the gap between theoretical research and practical treatments.
What are the differences
between Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) and Amyloid β-Protein (1-42), and why do they matter?
Amyloid
β-Protein (1-40) and Amyloid β-Protein (1-42) are both peptides derived from the cleavage of amyloid
precursor protein (APP) but they differ in their length, with the former comprising 40 amino acids and
the latter 42. This small difference in length has substantial implications for their biophysical
properties, aggregation behavior, and pathogenic potential, which are critical factors in Alzheimer's
disease (AD) research.
The main difference between Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) lies in their
aggregation kinetics and propensity to form fibrils. Aβ(1-42) has a higher tendency to aggregate and
form insoluble fibrils, which are more closely associated with the amyloid plaques found in AD brains.
It is generally more hydrophobic due to its additional two amino acids, which enhances its propensity to
aggregate. This increased aggregation is significant because it is the aggregated, fibrillar form of
amyloid that is often implicated in the neurotoxicity seen in AD. In contrast, Aβ(1-40) is less prone to
form fibrils and is thought to be less toxic than its Aβ(1-42) counterpart, but it is still involved in
plaque formation and can influence the aggregation of Aβ(1-42).
The ratio of Aβ(1-40) to Aβ(1-42)
is also a focus of research, as it can affect the onset and progression of AD. A higher proportion of
Aβ(1-42) is typically associated with an increased risk of plaque development and disease progression.
Some studies suggest that Aβ(1-40) might play a regulatory role in modulating the aggregation and
toxicity of Aβ(1-42) aggregates, potentially by co-aggregating or through competitive inhibition of
fibril formation.
Understanding the differences between these two peptides is vital for
developing therapeutic strategies. For instance, interventions aimed at lowering Aβ(1-42) without
decreasing Aβ(1-40) could be more effective in reducing the toxic impact of plaques while maintaining
essential physiological functions of amyloids. The role of Aβ(1-40) in normal cellular processes is less
understood, but it is less deleterious and may even play a protective or regulatory
role.
Additionally, the distinct properties of Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) are instrumental for
diagnostics. Tools and assays that differentiate between these two peptides can offer valuable
diagnostic information and help in tracking disease progress or regression in response to
treatments.
Ultimately, the distinctions between Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) are crucial in both
understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying AD and in guiding the development of targeted
treatments aimed at modulating their levels or aggregation behaviors.
How is Amyloid β-Protein
(1-40) utilized in laboratory research settings?
In laboratory research settings, Amyloid
β-Protein (1-40) is extensively utilized due to its critical role in the pathology of neurodegenerative
diseases, especially Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Researchers harness this peptide in various experimental
formats to study its properties, interactions, and impact under different biological
conditions.
One of the primary uses of Aβ(1-40) in research is to replicate and study the
formation of amyloid plaques. By manipulating concentrations and environmental conditions, scientists
can observe how Aβ(1-40) aggregates over time and identify factors that influence aggregation rates and
structures. This approach helps elucidate the initial stages of plaque formation, which is crucial for
understanding the cascade of events leading to neurodegeneration in AD.
Another research avenue
involves using Aβ(1-40) to study its toxicity to neural cells. Researchers apply Aβ(1-40) to cultured
neurons or brain slices to observe its effects on cell viability, signaling pathways, and synaptic
function. Through these studies, insights are gathered about the cellular mechanisms of amyloid toxicity
and how neurons respond to amyloid stress. This is a critical area of study as it informs potential
therapeutic strategies aiming to protect neurons from amyloid-induced damage.
Furthermore,
Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) is indispensable for screening and evaluating potential therapeutic compounds.
By adding drugs or compounds directly to Aβ(1-40) solutions or cell cultures, researchers can assess
their capacity to inhibit aggregation or mitigate amyloid-induced cellular damage. High-throughput
screening methods have been developed to identify thousands of compounds quickly, making Aβ(1-40) a
valuable tool for accelerating drug discovery in the context of anti-amyloid
therapeutics.
Additionally, Aβ(1-40) can be employed to study the biochemical pathways involved
in amyloid clearance. Researchers investigate how Aβ(1-40) is processed, transported, and degraded by
cellular and enzymatic mechanisms. This knowledge is crucial for understanding why amyloid accumulates
in diseases and how these processes might be altered therapeutically to enhance
clearance.
Researchers also use modified versions of Aβ(1-40) to understand alterations in
peptide structure and function. By substituting specific amino acids, scientists can study how these
changes affect peptide aggregation, toxicity, and interactions, offering broader insights into amyloid
pathophysiology.
In addition to in vitro studies, Aβ(1-40) is used in in vivo models to study
systemic and brain-specific responses to amyloidosis. Here, the peptide may be introduced into animal
models to observe the biological responses, including immune activation, inflammation, and changes in
neural circuitry, contributing to our understanding of AD progression.
Overall, the utilization
of Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) in laboratory settings is multifaceted, supporting fundamental research into
amyloid biology and providing a critical platform for developing therapeutic interventions aimed at
ameliorating amyloid-related diseases.
What are the challenges associated with using Amyloid
β-Protein (1-40) in research?
Using Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) in research presents several
challenges that researchers must address to obtain reliable and meaningful results. One significant
challenge is related to the peptide's tendency to aggregate, which, while relevant to its role in
disease, can complicate experimental consistency and reproducibility. The aggregation process is highly
sensitive to experimental conditions, including concentration, temperature, pH, and ionic strength.
Small deviations in these parameters can lead to significant differences in aggregation kinetics and
species, thus affecting experimental outcomes and complicating inter-laboratory
comparisons.
Another challenge lies in the peptide's intrinsic heterogeneity. Purity of the
peptide is crucial, as any contaminants can affect its biophysical properties and subsequent
interactions. Moreover, Aβ peptides can exist in multiple conformations and aggregation states, from
monomers to oligomers to fibrils, each having different biological activities and toxicities.
Distinguishing between these states in research assays and ensuring experimental models replicate the
desired amyloid form adds an extra layer of complexity.
Handling and storage conditions are
equally critical, as Aβ(1-40) can undergo irreversible changes if not managed properly. Researchers must
carefully control these conditions to preserve the peptide's structural integrity, which can be a
technical and logistical challenge, especially in long-term studies or high-throughput
settings.
The interpretation of results involving Aβ(1-40) can also be problematic due to its
physiological versus pathological roles. While Aβ(1-40) is most often associated with the pathogenic
processes in Alzheimer’s disease, it is also found in healthy brains, where it might play protective or
physiological roles. Therefore, distinguishing pathological effects from normal functions requires
careful experimental design and interpretation.
Furthermore, Aβ(1-40)'s interactions with other
proteins and cellular components are complex and not yet fully understood. It can bind to various
cellular receptors, proteins, and metal ions, each interaction potentially altering its aggregation,
toxicity, and clearance. This multifaceted interaction landscape complicates efforts to pinpoint
specific pathogenic mechanisms or identify binding targets for therapeutic intervention.
Another
potential obstacle is linked to the translation of findings from in vitro or animal models to human
conditions. Aβ(1-40) might behave differently in human systems due to unique aspects of human amyloid
biology or differences in systemic and neuronal responses, meaning that promising results in controlled
laboratory conditions do not always translate smoothly to clinical applications.
Lastly, the very
nature of targeting Aβ(1-40) therapeutically presents challenges due to amyloid’s biological role and
its involvement in complex, multifactorial disease processes. Therapeutic interventions aimed at
modulating Aβ(1-40) levels or its aggregation must balance efficacy with potential side effects,
avoiding inadvertent disruptions to normal neuronal functions or triggering compensatory
mechanisms.
In summary, while Amyloid β-Protein (1-40) is indispensable in neurodegenerative
research, especially for probing the mysteries of Alzheimer's disease, it brings numerous challenges
that require sophisticated strategies and meticulous precision in research protocols to overcome,
thereby ensuring that findings are both robust and applicable to human health.