Synonym |
ERP |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
P55533 |
Purity |
≥ 95% |
Endotoxin Level |
< 1.0 EU per 1 μg of protein |
Biological Activity |
Not specified |
Expression System |
E. coli |
Fusion Tag |
His Tag |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
1.6 kDa |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS |
Reconstitution |
Reconstitute in H₂O to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/ml |
Storage & Stability |
Store at -20°C. Once reconstituted, store at 4°C for up to one week or freeze at -20°C for
longer term. |
FAQ
What is Eledoisin-Related Peptide, and how does it function in biological
systems?
Eledoisin-Related Peptide (ERP) is a naturally occurring octapeptide primarily derived
from the salivary gland secretions of the octopus species Eledone. It belongs to the family of
tachykinin peptides, which are recognized for their wide range of biological activities, especially in
the nervous and immune systems. Tailoring this peptide in laboratory settings has enabled researchers to
better understand its multifaceted role in various physiological processes. Eledoisin and its related
peptides exert their effects by binding to specific tachykinin receptors—predominantly the neurokinin
receptors (NK1, NK2, and NK3)—which are G protein-coupled receptors widely distributed throughout the
body. The binding initiates a cascade of intracellular signaling pathways that contribute to its diverse
physiological effects. Once bound to these receptors, ERPs can modulate neurotransmission, influence
smooth muscle contraction, and play a pivotal role in neurogenic inflammation and pain transmission. The
peptide's ability to constrict or relax smooth muscle tissue varies according to its concentration and
the particular muscle type involved. Furthermore, the effects of ERPs exhibit a degree of tissue
specificity—a characteristic of paramount importance for biomedical research and potential therapeutic
applications. Beyond smooth muscle modulation, investigations suggest these peptides play a vital role
in neuron communication. They may enhance synaptic transmission and facilitate neuron-to-glia signaling,
valuable for uncovering novel insights into brain functionality and potential treatments for
neurological disorders. The specificity in receptor interaction and the variance in resultant biological
responses open further opportunities for pharmaceutical development targeting these pathways to manage
pain, inflammatory responses, and gastrointestinal or respiratory conditions. Overall, the mechanism of
action involves complex interactions at the molecular and cellular levels, emphasizing the breadth of
ERP's potential impact and the necessity for ongoing research into understanding these intricate
processes.
What are the potential therapeutic applications of Eledoisin-Related
Peptide?
The therapeutic potential of Eledoisin-Related Peptide (ERP) resides in its versatile
biological activities, which stem from its ability to engage with a wide array of cellular receptors.
These interactions hold promising implications in various medical domains. Primarily, ERP's capacity to
influence smooth muscle activity offers substantial opportunities in treating conditions related to the
gastrointestinal and respiratory systems. By modulating the contraction and relaxation of these muscles,
ERPs can potentially alleviate symptoms in disorders like asthma, where airway constriction is a primary
concern, or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), where bowel motility needs careful regulation. The peptide’s
notable effects on the nervous system also warrant attention. Its role in modulating neurotransmission
and facilitating communication between neurons indicates potential applications in neurology. Conditions
marked by neurotransmitter imbalance or dysregulated synaptic activity, such as schizophrenia or major
depressive disorder, might benefit from the regulatory properties of ERP. Ongoing research into its
effects on neurokinin receptors could lead to enhancing or developing pharmacological agents targeting
these pathways, offering new avenues for managing psychiatric and neurological disorders. Furthermore,
ERPs exhibit anti-inflammatory properties, making them intriguing candidates for treating inflammatory
conditions. By modulating immune system responses, such peptides can play a role in decreasing excessive
inflammation, relevant in autoimmune disorders or chronic inflammatory diseases. Their ability to
influence pain processing pathways also suggests potential in analgesia, particularly for chronic pain
management, where typical painkillers may fall short or cause significant side effects. Another
groundbreaking area of interest is the application of ERP in cancer research. Their action on receptor
sites might influence tumor growth pathways or invasion mechanisms, offering a potential dual role in
inhibiting cancer progression while managing associated pain and inflammation. However, clinical
applications must be carefully evaluated, with ongoing studies essential to ascertain the safety,
efficacy, and delivery methods appropriate for ERP-utilizing therapies. In conclusion, while the vast
therapeutic scope of ERPs is promising, translating these benefits from laboratory settings to clinical
practice necessitates meticulous research and development.
How does Eledoisin-Related Peptide
compare to other tachykinins in terms of biological activity?
Eledoisin-Related Peptide (ERP)
shares significant similarities with other tachykinins, such as substance P and neurokinin A, yet
exhibits distinctive features in its biological activity that set it apart within this peptide family.
Like its counterparts, ERP functions by interacting primarily with neurokinin receptors, notably NK1,
NK2, and NK3, which are instrumental in a myriad of physiological and pathophysiological processes. One
of the key differentiators of ERP is its origin; it is derived from specific marine organisms, giving it
unique structural attributes that might contribute to its comparatively varied receptor affinity and
selectivity. This structural uniqueness could influence its potency and functional efficacy across
different biological contexts. In contrast to substance P, which is ubiquitously expressed in both the
central and peripheral nervous systems and predominantly associated with inflammatory processes and pain
mediation, ERP might have more restricted tissue distribution, leading to more specialized or localized
effects. In studies comparing the smooth muscle activity modulation, ERP often demonstrates differential
activity profiles, potentially offering a favorable safety margin due to its more tissue-specific
effects. While substance P is heavily implicated in neurogenic inflammation and pain pathways, ERP shows
promise in uniquely modulating smooth muscle activity, possibly affording therapeutic benefits in
respiratory or gastrointestinal contexts where targeted muscle relaxation or contraction is desired.
Additionally, the influence of ERP on the immune system, while overlapping with other tachykinins in
terms of pro-inflammatory signaling, might extend differentially into modulating broader immune
responses. Comparative research indicates variations in how these peptides can affect immune cell
behavior and inflammatory mediator production, suggesting niche applications in managing specific
inflammatory or immune-mediated conditions. Moreover, unlike some other tachykinins, ERP's activity on
neurokinin receptors might be exploited for exploring novel drug delivery systems or formulations that
could optimize its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, harnessing its potentially unique
receptor binding for targeted therapeutic interventions. Notwithstanding the overlap in receptor
interactions with other tachykinins, ERP’s distinct origins and biological activities may carve out
unique therapeutic niches, warranting further exploration through both basic and applied
research.
What research is needed before Eledoisin-Related Peptide can be widely used in medical
treatments?
The journey from bench to bedside for Eledoisin-Related Peptide (ERP) entails
rigorous research to ensure its efficacy and safety as a medical treatment. While preliminary findings
underscore its therapeutic potential, extensive research across several domains is paramount before ERP
can be mainstreamed into clinical practice. One critical area necessitating further investigation is the
comprehensive mapping of ERP's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Understanding how ERP is absorbed,
distributed, metabolized, and excreted by the body aids in optimizing delivery methods and dosage
regimens. This understanding is essential in minimizing potential adverse effects while maximizing
therapeutic efficacy. Studies focusing on metabolism and inter-individual variability will ensure ERP's
effectiveness across diverse patient populations. Furthermore, delineating ERP’s interaction with
neurokinin receptor subtypes will enrich the understanding of its therapeutic targets and broaden its
application scope. As these receptor pathways can differ subtly between species, detailed comparative
studies are required to validate ERP's effects in humans. Preclinical testing in various animal models
helps unravel these receptor interactions, yet translating these findings to human physiology remains a
pivotal stage. Toxicological assessments are another cornerstone of this translational journey.
Identifying any toxicological liabilities, such as potential for immunogenic responses or unintended
receptor interactions, is crucial for assessing ERP's long-term safety profile. Consequently, rigorous
safety evaluations via preclinical trials can aid in uncovering possible side effects, safe dosage
thresholds, and potential counterindications. In parallel, clinical trials need to be designed with
precision, encompassing diverse population groups to evaluate both efficacy and safety comprehensively.
These trials should be multi-phased, beginning with small-scale Phase I trials to ascertain safety and
dosage range, followed by larger Phase II and III trials for efficacy and side effect profiling. Beyond
the fundamental safety and efficacy studies, there is a pressing need to explore ERP's impact on various
pathological states, identifying where its application could yield the most significant benefits. This
exploration involves experimental and potentially observational studies in specific patient cohorts,
such as those with chronic inflammatory diseases or neurodegenerative conditions. Ultimately, an
interdisciplinary approach combining biochemistry, pharmacology, and clinical research is vital, with
collaboration across academic institutions, biotechnology companies, and regulatory bodies to establish
Eledoisin-Related Peptide as a mainstay in therapeutic applications, ensuring its benefits are realized
in a safe, regulated manner.
What are the challenges in synthesizing Eledoisin-Related Peptide
for research and therapeutic use?
The synthesis of Eledoisin-Related Peptide (ERP) poses several
scientific and technical challenges that must be addressed to advance its use in research and
therapeutic contexts. One primary hurdle lies in its complex peptide structure, which requires precise
chemical synthesis techniques to replicate accurately. Given that ERPs comprise a specific sequence of
amino acids, the synthesis process needs to achieve a high level of fidelity to ensure biological
activity, exact structural integrity, and stability. Advanced techniques such as solid-phase peptide
synthesis (SPPS) are commonly employed, yet they demand meticulous optimization of coupling reactions
and purification steps to yield high-quality peptide. Moreover, the presence of multiple chiral centers
within ERP's structure compounds the difficulty. These chiral centers necessitate the use of
stereoselective synthesis strategies to ensure the correct three-dimensional conformation of the
peptide—a critical factor in its biological activity and receptor binding affinity. Incorrect synthesis
leading to racemic mixtures could significantly impede its physiological effectiveness and consistency
in research findings or therapeutic applications. Another substantive challenge is scalability. While
small-scale synthesis might suffice for research purposes, producing ERP at a scale necessary for
widescale clinical use is considerably more arduous. The transition from bench-scale to industrial-scale
peptide production requires addressing issues such as reaction yields, costs, and maintaining peptide
purity and uniformity. This scaling problem is compounded by the need to adhere to good manufacturing
practice (GMP) standards, which necessitates rigorous process validation, quality control, and
compliance with regulatory requirements. Additionally, the stability of ERP during synthesis and storage
is a concern, as peptides are generally susceptible to degradation through oxidation, hydrolysis, and
other chemical modifications. Crafting formulations that extend ERP’s shelf-life and preserve its
activity over time poses a significant challenge, requiring in-depth studies into optimal protective
strategies, such as lyophilization or encapsulation techniques. Lastly, intellectual property and
regulatory landscapes present their own sets of obstacles. Navigating the patent environment for novel
synthesis methods or peptide modifications is essential to facilitate the commercial development of
ERP-based therapies. Additionally, ensuring regulatory compliance for any synthesized peptides intended
for human use is a complex process, necessitating early and ongoing engagement with regulatory agencies
to align with their standards and expectations. Multidisciplinary collaboration and continuous
innovation in chemistry and biotechnology are crucial to overcoming these synthesis challenges, thereby
enabling the broad and effective utilization of Eledoisin-Related Peptide in both labs and clinics.