Synonym |
N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
P11573 |
Purity |
Greater than 95% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
<1.0 EU per 1 μg of the protein by the LAL method |
Biological Activity |
The ED50 for this effect is typically 1-10 nM. |
Expression System |
E. coli |
Fusion Tag |
None |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
4378 Da |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in Acetonitrile and TFA |
Reconstitution |
Centrifuge the vial prior to opening. Reconstitute in water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/ml.
|
Storage & Stability |
Store at -20°C. Stable for 12 months at -20°C from the date of receipt. |
FAQ
What is fMLF and how does it work in the body?
fMLF, or N-Formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine,
is a tripeptide, which means it consists of three amino acids linked together. It plays a crucial role
in the immune response as a chemoattractant, particularly influencing the behavior of neutrophils, which
are a type of white blood cell. These cells are essential in the body's defense mechanism against
infections and injuries. fMLF is known as a potent chemotactic agent, meaning it attracts neutrophils to
sites of infection or tissue damage. It achieves this by binding to specific receptors on the surface of
neutrophils, known as formyl peptide receptors (FPRs). This binding initiates a cascade of intracellular
signals that lead to the activation and movement of neutrophils towards higher concentrations of the
peptide, effectively guiding them to the site where they are needed.
The presence of formyl
peptides like fMLF is a signal to immune cells of bacterial invasion or cellular tissue damage. This is
because these peptides are often released by bacterial cells or are part of mitochondrial damage in
eukaryotic cells, signaling potential threats to the body. Once the fMLF binds to the FPRs on the
neutrophils, a series of rapid cellular responses are triggered. These responses include changes in the
cell’s shape, increased motility, and the upregulation of effector functions such as superoxide
production and degranulation, all of which are critical for the elimination of pathogens.
The
mechanism of action of fMLF in immune cells underscores its significance in the acute inflammatory
process. Neutrophils respond to fMLF gradients in a process called chemotaxis, efficiently moving toward
the higher concentrations of the peptide found at sites of inflammation or microbial activity. This
targeting system ensures that immune cells are deployed effectively where their action is required most.
Additionally, the engagement of FPRs not only facilitates movement and activation of neutrophils but
also primes them for engulfing pathogens and producing antimicrobial substances. This process plays a
central role in both innate immunity, which is the body’s first line of defense, and in shaping the
adaptive immune responses when the immediate reaction is insufficient to clear an infection.
In
summary, fMLF is a powerful chemoattractant peptide that is crucial in directing immune responses to
infection or injury. By activating specific receptors on neutrophils, it ensures rapid and effective
mobilization and activation of these immune cells to contain and resolve potentially harmful situations
within the body. This makes it an important target for research into how immune responses can be
modulated in cases of excessive inflammation or autoimmune disorders, where the recruitment and
activation of immune cells need to be controlled.
How is fMLF used in scientific
research?
In scientific research, fMLF is utilized primarily as a tool to study neutrophil
behavior and the mechanisms underpinning chemotaxis, immune response, and cellular signaling. Given its
key role in the immune system as a chemotactic agent, it serves as an ideal model compound to explore
various aspects of cell biology and immunology. In laboratories, fMLF is often employed in experiments
designed to observe and quantify the movement of neutrophils. Researchers use it to understand how these
cells navigate towards the source of infection, a process critical for developing therapies to manage
and treat inflammatory diseases.
One of the compelling reasons for using fMLF in research is its
ability to activate formyl peptide receptors (FPRs). This is significant because these receptors are
part of a larger family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are involved in various
physiological processes beyond just the immune response. By studying how fMLF interacts with these
receptors, scientists can gain insights into the broader function and regulation of GPCRs, which are
common targets in therapeutic drug design.
fMLF is also instrumental in the study of diseases
characterized by dysfunctional neutrophil activity, such as chronic inflammatory conditions, autoimmune
diseases, and certain infectious diseases. By using fMLF to stimulate neutrophils in vitro, researchers
can mimic certain pathological conditions and investigate how these cells can be modulated or harnessed
to improve disease outcomes. This has implications for developing targeted treatments that may help
modulate immune responses where they are excessively activated or insufficient.
Moreover, the
study of fMLF helps in elucidating the pathways involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.
Neutrophils, upon activation by fMLF, increase their production of ROS, which are critical in the
destruction of pathogens but can also contribute to tissue damage if not regulated properly. Therefore,
understanding how fMLF influences ROS production offers potential therapeutic insights into managing
conditions where oxidative stress is a factor.
In addition, fMLF can be used in research focusing
on the identification and characterization of new receptor agonists and antagonists. By screening
compounds in the presence of fMLF, researchers can determine how new drugs might suppress or enhance
immune responses, which is invaluable in drug development for inflammatory and infectious
diseases.
In conclusion, fMLF serves as a versatile and powerful tool in scientific research,
predominantly in immunology, pharmacology, and cell biology. Its ability to reliably induce chemotaxis
and activate immune cells makes it indispensable for experiments aimed at understanding and manipulating
immune responses. By continuing to explore its mechanisms of action and effects, researchers can
contribute significantly to the development of new therapeutic strategies for a variety of
immune-related conditions.
What are the primary receptors that mediate fMLF activity and their
roles?
The primary receptors that mediate the activity of fMLF are the formyl peptide receptors
(FPRs), a subset of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) family. These receptors are integral to the
immune system, particularly in the response to bacterial infections and tissue damage. Among the various
FPRs, FPR1 is the most well-characterized receptor in humans concerning its interaction with fMLF.
Understanding the roles of these receptors is crucial for elucidating their contribution to immune
responses and their potential as therapeutic targets.
FPR1, the primary receptor for fMLF, is
predominantly expressed in neutrophils, monocytes, and to some extent, in epithelial cells. Upon binding
of fMLF, FPR1 initiates a variety of intracellular signaling pathways that lead to chemotaxis, a process
where immune cells move towards higher concentrations of the peptide, typically sites of infection or
inflammation. Activation of FPR1 results in the rapid mobilization of intracellular calcium, production
of inositol trisphosphate (IP3), and the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and
phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks), all of which contribute to changes in cell function and structure
necessary for movement and microbial killing.
Beyond facilitating chemotaxis, FPR1 activation
also enhances several other immune functions. These include respiratory burst activity, which involves
the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill pathogens, and the release of proteolytic
enzymes from neutrophil granules to break down microbial structures and damaged tissues. This receptor
is therefore not only crucial for directing cells to areas of need but also primes them for effective
pathogen clearance once they reach their destination.
In addition to FPR1, other members of the
FPR family, such as FPR2 and FPR3, also interact with formyl peptides, although their ligand
specificities and expression patterns differ. FPR2, for example, is known to bind a broader range of
ligands, including those involved in inflammation resolution, suggesting its dual role in both promoting
and resolving inflammatory responses. This makes FPR2 a particularly interesting target in research
focused on managing chronic inflammation and autoimmune disorders.
The role of FPR3, on the other
hand, is less understood but is thought to be involved in the resolution of inflammation and modulation
of immune responses. Understanding the specific functions of these receptors is an area of active
research, as it holds the potential to uncover new mechanisms of immune modulation that could be
harnessed in therapeutic interventions.
Studying these receptors and their interaction with fMLF
and other ligands thus provides significant insights into the regulation of immune responses. It
highlights the sophisticated nature of immune cell signaling pathways and their potential manipulation
for therapeutic benefit. For example, in diseases where immune cell recruitment needs to be suppressed,
targeting FPR pathways might provide a means to dampen inflammation. Conversely, enhancing FPR activity
could aid in boosting immunity in situations where it is compromised.
In essence, formyl peptide
receptors, particularly FPR1, play pivotal roles in mediating the effects of fMLF and thereby
orchestrating immune responses to infections and inflammation. Their study not only contributes to a
deeper understanding of immune cell behavior but also presents opportunities for the development of
novel immunomodulatory treatments.
What are the physiological and potential therapeutic
implications of fMLF?
The physiological implications of fMLF center on its role as a potent
chemoattractant for immune cells, particularly neutrophils, which are fundamental in the body's first
line of defense against infections. By directing these immune cells to sites of infection or injury,
fMLF helps facilitate a rapid and effective immune response. The physiological response to fMLF involves
intricate signaling pathways that result in enhanced cell motility, upregulated antimicrobial activity,
and orchestrated tissue repair processes. This underscores its indispensable role in maintaining
homeostasis and defending against pathogens.
In terms of therapeutic implications, fMLF and its
pathways have sparked significant interest in the field of drug development. Since excessive
inflammation can lead to tissue damage and chronic inflammatory diseases, understanding how fMLF and its
receptors function presents opportunities for therapeutic interventions that aim to modulate
inflammatory responses. Drugs targeting the fMLF receptor pathways, particularly formyl peptide
receptors (FPRs), could potentially treat a range of conditions characterized by either excessive or
inadequate immune responses.
One potential therapeutic application of manipulating fMLF pathways
is in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid
arthritis, Crohn's disease, and psoriasis. In these diseases, the immune system inappropriately attacks
the body’s own tissues, leading to chronic inflammation and tissue damage. By targeting FPR-related
pathways, it may be possible to dampen the inappropriate immune responses and alleviate the symptoms
associated with these diseases.
Conversely, in instances where the immune response needs to be
enhanced, such as in immunocompromised patients or during severe infections, stimulating fMLF pathways
might improve immune efficacy by boosting neutrophil recruitment and activity. This approach could be
valuable in the context of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria, where boosting the innate
immune response might aid in overcoming the pathogen's defenses.
Moreover, the role of fMLF in
wound healing and tissue repair processes suggests another avenue for therapeutic applications. By
enhancing the recruitment of immune cells that not only fight infection but also facilitate tissue
repair, fMLF-related treatments could accelerate recovery from wounds and surgery. This could also
extend to treatment strategies aimed at minimizing scarring or promoting regeneration in tissues
suffering from chronic damage.
Furthermore, ongoing research is exploring the use of small
molecule modulators of fMLF receptors to fine-tune immune responses during therapeutic interventions.
These modulators could offer a sophisticated means to achieve the desired immune outcomes without broad
suppression of the immune system, leading to potentially fewer side effects compared to current
anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs.
In conclusion, the physiological role of fMLF as a
key player in immune cell trafficking and activation has laid the foundation for exploring various
therapeutic avenues. The ability to modulate these responses holds promise for treating a range of
conditions that currently have limited treatment options. As our understanding of fMLF and its receptors
deepens, it is likely that new and innovative therapeutic strategies will emerge, offering hope for more
effective management of both inflammatory and infectious diseases. This highlights the importance of
continued research in this area to unlock the full therapeutic potential of fMLF pathways.
Are
there any known side effects or risks associated with targeting fMLF pathways?
Targeting fMLF
pathways, particularly through the modulation of formyl peptide receptors (FPRs), presents both
therapeutic promise and potential risks. While the modulation of these pathways offers novel avenues for
treatment of various conditions, it is essential to consider the possible side effects and risks
associated with such interventions. The complexity of immune system regulation means that any
manipulation must be approached with caution to avoid unintended consequences.
One of the primary
concerns when targeting fMLF pathways is the potential for exacerbating or inducing inflammatory
responses. Since fMLF plays a crucial role in neutrophil activation and chemotaxis, excessive
stimulation of this pathway could potentially lead to hyperactivation of neutrophils. This may result in
increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the release of proteolytic enzymes, which can
cause tissue damage and exacerbate inflammatory conditions. In chronic inflammatory diseases, where the
immune response is already dysregulated, such interventions could worsen the clinical
symptoms.
Additionally, there is the risk of off-target effects, which is a common concern in
drug development targeting complex receptor systems like FPRs. Given that FPRs can bind various ligands
and have widespread roles in inflammation and immune response, non-specific activation or inhibition
might affect pathways beyond intended targets. This could lead to disturbances in immune homeostasis,
manifesting as increased susceptibility to infections or unintended suppression of necessary immune
functions.
Another potential risk is the induction of autoimmune responses. By modulating
pathways involved in immune cell recruitment and activation, there is a possibility of inadvertently
triggering immune responses against the body’s own tissues. Such an outcome could potentially initiate
or exacerbate autoimmune conditions, which are typically characterized by the body’s immune system
mistakenly attacking its own cells.
Furthermore, there is a concern regarding the impact on
normal host-microbiome interactions. The microbiome plays a significant role in maintaining immune
homeostasis, and any perturbation in fMLF pathways could disrupt the delicate balance between host
defenses and microbial tolerance. This could result in dysbiosis and associated health issues, such as
increased susceptibility to infections or chronic inflammatory diseases.
Despite these potential
risks, it’s important to recognize that ongoing research is focused on developing more selective and
targeted interventions that aim to minimize such side effects. Advances in molecular biology and
pharmacology are paving the way for the development of drugs that can specifically target desired
pathways with high precision, potentially reducing the incidence of off-target effects and improving
therapeutic outcomes.
In conclusion, while targeting fMLF pathways presents exciting
possibilities for treating diseases associated with inflammation and immune dysregulation, it is not
without its risks. A comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and careful design of
therapeutic interventions are crucial to mitigate these risks. With continued research and development,
it is likely that safer and more effective therapies will emerge, offering benefits while minimizing
potential adverse effects. It remains vital to approach such developments with an awareness of possible
side effects, ensuring that therapeutic gains are achieved without compromising overall health.