Synonym |
Gastrin I (human) (sulfated) |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
P01350 |
Purity |
Greater than 95% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
Less than 0.1 ng per µg of protein |
Biological Activity |
Not specified |
Expression System |
Escherichia coli |
Fusion Tag |
None |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
Approximately 2093 Da |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in 30% acetonitrile and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid
|
Reconstitution |
It is recommended to reconstitute the lyophilized Gastrin I in sterile 18 MΩ-cm H2O not less
than 100 µg/ml, which can then be further diluted to other aqueous solutions. |
Storage & Stability |
Store lyophilized Gastrin I at -20°C. Aliquot the product after reconstitution to avoid repeated
freeze-thaw cycles. Reconstituted Gastrin I can be stored at 4°C for a limited period of time.
It is recommended to store at the lowest possible temperature to minimize protein degradation.
|
FAQ
What is Gastrin I (human) (sulfated), Gastrin II, and how do they function in the body?
Gastrin I
(human) (sulfated) and Gastrin II are peptides that play a critical role in the digestive system,
particularly in the regulation of gastric functions. Gastrin is a hormone produced by G-cells in the
gastric antrum, duodenum, and pancreas. This hormone functions primarily by stimulating the secretion of
gastric acid (HCl) by the parietal cells of the stomach and aiding in gastric motility. This process is
crucial for the digestive phase as it ensures that the stomach maintains an acidic environment necessary
for the activation of digestive enzymes, such as pepsinogen to pepsin, which breaks down proteins into
peptides.
In addition to its primary role in acid regulation, gastrin also supports gastric
mucosa health by promoting the proliferation of gastric mucosal cells. This function plays a protective
role, as it maintains the integrity of the stomach lining, thereby reducing the risk of damage that can
be caused by excessive acid concentrations. Gastrin does not work in isolation; its action is part of a
larger network of hormones and neurotransmitters that work together to ensure efficient digestion and
nutrient absorption.
The sulfation aspect of Gastrin I indicates a post-translational
modification which is crucial for its biological activity. Sulfation can alter the biological function
and activity of peptides, impacting receptor binding and activity. In the case of Gastrin, sulfation at
a tyrosine residue affects its interaction with the CCK2 receptor, enhancing its potency and stability.
This ensures that the peptide can execute its function effectively in the acidic environment of the
stomach.
Gastrin II, which is another form of this peptide, acts similarly but with subtle
differences in its activity and regulation. While it shares the receptor with Gastrin I and is also
involved in acid secretion and gastric motility, the distinct physiological roles and regulation of
these forms can have unique implications in both normal physiology and disease states such as
Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, where there is excessive gastrin production leading to increased gastric
acid secretion.
Therefore, understanding the interplay between Gastrin I (sulfated) and Gastrin
II provides insightful perspectives on their importance in gastrointestinal health, their potential
therapeutic targets, and the underpinnings of conditions associated with their dysregulation.
How
does Gastrin impact the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders, and what potential therapeutic roles do
Gastrin I (human) (sulfated) and Gastrin II play?
Gastrin has long been recognized for its
pivotal role in gastrointestinal physiology, particularly concerning gastric acid secretion. Due to
this, it has been a central focus in understanding and developing treatments for various
gastrointestinal disorders. Disorders such as peptic ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and
Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are directly linked to abnormal gastric acid secretion, making the regulation
of gastrin a critical therapeutic target.
Understanding the impact of Gastrin, particularly in
its sulfated and non-sulfated forms, such as Gastrin I and II, allows for a more nuanced approach to
treatment. Both forms interact with the CCK2 receptor, influencing not just acid secretion but also
gastric motility and mucosal growth. Due to these diverse roles, manipulating gastrin levels or blocking
its receptor can provide therapeutic benefits.
One of the therapeutic roles of gastrin
manipulation is the control of excessive gastric acid production, as seen in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome,
a condition characterized by gastrin-secreting tumors (gastrinomas) that lead to peptic ulcers. In such
scenarios, targeting gastrin or its receptor with specific antagonists can reduce acid hypersecretion
and alleviate symptoms. Similarly, in GERD, where acid suppression is a cornerstone of management,
gastrin receptor antagonists could play a role in normalizing acid production, thereby reducing reflux
symptoms and esophageal damage.
Furthermore, Gastrin's involvement in mucosal growth suggests
potential therapeutic applications in conditions where mucosal integrity is compromised, such as
atrophic gastritis. By promoting mucosal regeneration, gastrin or its analogs, especially sulfated forms
that may have enhanced biological activity, could aid in restoring gastric health.
Importantly,
the therapeutic implications of gastrin extend beyond just inhibition; in some conditions, enhancing its
activity may be beneficial. For instance, patients with hypochlorhydria (low stomach acid) or certain
post-surgical states who suffer from reduced acid and enzyme secretion might benefit from gastrin
analogs to support digestion.
In summary, the nuanced roles of Gastrin I (sulfated) and Gastrin
II in gastrointestinal physiology present opportunities for targeted therapies in a spectrum of
digestive disorders. By understanding how these peptides function and interrelate with gastric
processes, clinicians can better tailor interventions that address both hypersecretory and hyposecretory
conditions, enhance mucosal healing, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. As research continues, the
therapeutic landscape of gastrin will likely expand, offering more refined strategies for managing
gastrointestinal diseases.
What role does the sulfation of Gastrin I play in its biological
activity, and how does it differ from non-sulfated gastrins?
Sulfation is a critical
post-translational modification that significantly influences the biological activity of various
peptides, including gastrins. For Gastrin I, sulfation occurs at the tyrosine residue within its
sequence, which alters several of its functional characteristics. The presence or absence of this
sulfate group can change the peptide's receptor interactions, stability, and activity, hence
understanding this modification is essential for appreciating its biological roles.
Sulfation
enhances Gastrin I’s binding affinity to the CCK2 receptor, the primary receptor through which it exerts
its physiological functions, such as stimulating gastric acid secretion and regulating gastric motility.
This increased affinity means that sulfated Gastrin I can more effectively and potently activate the
receptor compared to its non-sulfated counterparts. As a result, even minimal concentrations of sulfated
gastrin can exert significant biological effects, making it a highly efficient physiological
regulator.
Moreover, this structural modification affects the peptide's stability in the acidic
environment of the stomach, enhancing its resilience against proteolytic degradation and ensuring that
its biological activity is sustained over a more extended period. This influence on stability is
crucial, given the harsh conditions peptides are exposed to in the gastrointestinal tract.
The
sulfation also imparts specificity in the functional roles of gastrins. While both sulfated and
non-sulfated forms can stimulate acid secretion, the sulfated variant is more adept at inducing certain
secondary effects, such as stimulating gastric mucosal growth. These differences underscore the
importance of sulfation in fine-tuning the hormone's physiological roles and effects on gastric
functions.
The implications of these differences are not purely physiological but also
therapeutic. Understanding the distinctions between sulfated and non-sulfated gastrins opens avenues for
developing targeted treatments and diagnostic tools, particularly in disorders characterized by
excessive or reduced gastric acid secretion. For instance, synthetic analogs that mimic the sulfated
form of gastrin could be developed to either enhance lacking gastric functions in conditions like
atrophic gastritis or to use as competitive antagonists in states of hypersecretion without triggering
excessive acid production themselves.
In conclusion, the sulfation of Gastrin I is a vital
determinant of its biological activity, influencing receptor interactions, stability, and functional
efficacy. By addressing the structural and functional aspects of this modification, researchers and
clinicians can better comprehend the gastrin peptide family's roles and leverage this knowledge for
therapeutic advancements in gastrointestinal health management.
Can Gastrin I (human) (sulfated)
and Gastrin II be used in diagnostic applications, and if so, how?
The diagnostic applications of
gastrin, particularly Gastrin I (sulfated) and Gastrin II, have been extensively explored due to their
significant role in gastric acid regulation and motility. In clinical diagnostics, measuring gastrin
levels, especially in their various modified forms, can provide essential insights into different
gastrointestinal conditions and the body's pathophysiological status.
Elevated levels of gastrin
are often associated with conditions like Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, where gastrin-secreting tumors
lead to excessive acid production. In this context, both Gastrin I and II can serve as biomarkers to
confirm diagnosis and monitor treatment efficacy. The presence of sulfated gastrin, with its enhanced
biological potency, may offer additional insights into disease severity and progression. Measuring the
specific form of gastrin, including sulfated versus non-sulfated, could also help in distinguishing
between different causes of hypergastrinemia, such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome versus proton pump
inhibitor use, as each scenario might involve different levels and forms of gastrin.
Furthermore,
gastrin’s role is not limited to characterizing conditions related to hypersecretion only. It could also
aid in evaluating hypochlorhydria, where there is diminished gastric acid production. Here, comparative
gastrin assays that differentiate between the sulfated and non-sulfated forms can help assess the
compensatory mechanisms in play or identify any underlying atrophic changes within the gastric mucosa
contributing to acid output alteration.
Besides serving as a biomarker for acid-related
disorders, Gastrin I (sulfated) and Gastrin II might have potential in assessing the status of mucosal
lining and its regeneration capacity. Because gastrin stimulates mucosal growth, abnormal levels could
indicate alterations in mucosal health, providing a mode to assess healing in conditions like peptic
ulcers or gastritis.
In terms of methodological approaches, sensitive assays and immunoassays
have been developed to measure gastrin levels in blood. However, a significant consideration is the
form-specific measurement, requiring antibodies or probes that precisely recognize and differentiate
between sulfated and non-sulfated variants, ensuring accuracy and clinical relevance in
diagnoses.
Overall, Gastrin I (sulfated) and Gastrin II hold substantial promise in diagnostic
applications related to gastric function disorders. Their role as biomarkers complements other
diagnostic approaches, providing a more holistic view of gastrointestinal health and enabling clinicians
to tailor interventions more closely aligned with the underlying physiological disturbances. However,
the full realization of their diagnostic potential requires ongoing advancements in detection
technologies and an enhanced understanding of their differential roles in various pathophysiological
conditions.