Synonym |
PAR-4 (1-6) |
Species |
Human |
Protein Accession |
P27448 |
Purity |
Greater than 95% as determined by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
< 0.1 EU per 1 μg of the protein |
Biological Activity |
The activity of this protein is verified by its ability to inhibit trypsin cleavage of a
fluorogenic peptide substrate. |
Expression System |
Escherichia coli |
Fusion Tag |
None |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
6 kDa |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution of 20 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 |
Reconstitution |
It is recommended to reconstitute the lyophilized PAR-4 (1-6) in sterile 18 MΩ-cm H2O not less
than 100 µg/ml, which can then be further diluted to other aqueous solutions. |
Storage & Stability |
Store lyophilized protein at -20°C. Aliquot the product after reconstitution to avoid repeated
freezing/thawing cycles. Reconstituted protein can be stored at 4°C for a limited period of
time; it does not show any change after two weeks at 4°C. |
FAQ
What is PAR-4 (1-6) (human) and how does it function in the context of human biology?
PAR-4 (1-6) is
a peptide segment derived from the N-terminal sequence of the Prostate Apoptosis Response-4 (PAR-4)
protein. PAR-4 is a tumor suppressor protein known for its role in facilitating apoptosis, particularly
in cancer cells which show resistance to other forms of cell death. Within human biology, PAR-4 exhibits
a dual functionality: it contributes both to the regulation of normal cellular processes and offers a
defensive mechanism against cancerous growths. The functional peptide, PAR-4 (1-6), represents the amino
acids crucial for the initiation of these apoptotic pathways and serves as a significant biochemical
signal for apoptosis induction. The mechanism by which PAR-4 (1-6) operates relates to its ability to
sensitize cancer cells to apoptosis without harming normal cells. It does this primarily through
cofactors that modify the peptide’s interaction with FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme (FLICE)
inhibitory protein (FLIP) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB), thereby disrupting cancer cell survival
pathways. Thus, understanding its role in human biology involves not just its biochemical activities but
also its capacity to serve therapeutic goals aimed at eradicating cancer cells while sparing healthy
tissues.
How is PAR-4 (1–6) (human) significant in cancer research and therapy?
PAR-4 (1-6)
holds tremendous significance in cancer research and therapy due to its multifaceted role in apoptosis
and its unique ability to specifically target cancer cells. One of the principal challenges in oncology
is treating cancer cells that have developed resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. This
is where PAR-4 (1-6) demonstrates its utility. As a part of the larger PAR-4 protein, this peptide takes
advantage of selective pathways to promote cancer cell death while leaving normal cells unharmed. This
makes it a promising candidate for developing cancer therapies that have fewer side effects, addressing
one of the prevalent issues in current cancer treatments. It is primarily its capability to inhibit
survival pathways within cancer cells, like the Akt and NF-kB pathways, and its effectiveness in
combination with p53, a crucial tumor suppressor, that differentiates its therapeutic potential. In
addition, its ability to enhance the efficacy of other cancer therapies, and help overcome drug
resistance offers further promise. Moreover, recent research highlights its role in stimulating immune
responses against tumors, making it a possible agent for immune-checkpoint blockade therapies. Thus,
with its diverse mechanisms and specificity, PAR-4 (1-6) is a beacon of hope for future cancer
treatments, making it a pivotal area of study and therapy development.
Are there any known side
effects or safety concerns associated with PAR-4 (1-6) (human)?
At this junction, most data
concerning PAR-4 (1-6) revolves around preclinical studies, with a focus on elucidating its function,
mechanisms, and therapeutic potential in vitro and in vivo, predominantly within animal models. As with
any prospective therapeutic agent, the evaluation of side effects and safety is paramount. To date,
studies indicate that PAR-4, in its broader context, harbors an inherent capacity for selective cell
targeting, which suggests a reduced side effect profile compared to many anticancer agents. This
selective targeting is beneficial as it implies minimized off-target effects — a common concern in
cancer treatments that can result in significant toxicity and side effects. Nonetheless, it's crucial to
underline that human-based studies are required to consolidate these findings and rigorously assess
potential side effects. Additionally, caution is advised when extrapolating animal model data to humans
due to physiological and metabolic variances. By understanding its integration within biochemical
pathways, researchers aim to mitigate any prospective safety issues. Therefore, ongoing research
emphasizes dose optimization and delivery mechanisms that could curtail any adverse outcomes. The
peptide's safety evaluation in clinical settings is necessary for characterizing its complete safety
profile. Future trials and studies will disclose further insights concerning its safety, ensuring that
therapeutic use within human subjects harnesses its full potential while minimizing risks.
Could
PAR-4 (1-6) (human) be used in other diseases apart from cancer?
While PAR-4 (1-6) is chiefly
celebrated for its role in cancer biology due to its apoptosis-inducing properties, its potential
application in other diseases is a burgeoning area of research. Its mechanism, inherently linked to
apoptosis, perhaps offers insights into other diseases characterized by dysregulation of cell death
processes, such as neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cardiovascular diseases. In
neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, where apoptosis contributes to the
loss of neuronal cells, deciphering PAR-4's role could provide pathways to develop strategies for either
protecting neurons or managing pathological apoptosis. Similarly, within autoimmune disorders, where
cell death and survival mechanisms are erroneously activated, aligning PAR-4's capabilities with
therapeutic targets could serve in modulating immune responses. Cardiovascular diseases, where cell
death significantly impacts the pathological progression, might also benefit from its applications by
safeguarding myocardial cells upon ischemic injuries. Nonetheless, translating these prospects into
treatments necessitates comprehensive understanding and research to elucidate the bioactivity, kinetics,
and interaction of PAR-4 (1-6) in contexts beyond oncology. While its non-cancer prospects are promising
due to the ubiquitous nature of apoptotic mechanisms across various pathologies, targeted investigations
remain pivotal to harness its full potential effectively and safely, tailoring its application to the
unique biochemical landscapes present in different diseases.
What challenges remain in the
development of PAR-4 (1-6) (human) as a therapeutic agent?
The development of PAR-4 (1-6) as a
therapeutic agent, whilst promising, is attended by a series of significant challenges that impede swift
translation from bench to bedside. Initially, the specificity of targeting cancer cells while preserving
normal cells' integrity requires comprehensive research to validate therapeutic windows and dosing
regimens. Navigating the heterogeneity of cancer, which can lead to diverse responses across different
cancer types, remains a formidable hurdle. This requires tailoring therapy to fit specific cancer
profiles or subtypes efficiently. Furthermore, ensuring its stability, bioavailability, and effective
delivery to target tissues further complicates the therapeutic landscape, necessitating advances in drug
delivery systems, such as nanoparticle delivery or conjugation with other molecules for enhanced
penetration and retention. Regulatory challenges also abound, as the establishment of recovery and
efficacy benchmarks demands rigorous scrutiny involving both preclinical and clinical trials, compounded
by the slow pace of recruitment and high costs often associated with such trials. An in-depth
understanding of any unintended off-target effects or the implications of long-term exposure also
necessitates elucidation. Finally, the adaptation of current healthcare infrastructures and systems to
incorporate such novel treatments requires not only logistical but also socio-political acceptance,
further emphasizing the array of challenges that developers, clinicians, and researchers must
collectively navigate in the quest to leverage PAR-4 (1-6) as a viable therapeutic entity.
How
does PAR-4 (1-6) (human) compare with other apoptosis-inducing agents?
PAR-4 (1-6) differentiates
itself from other apoptosis-inducing agents through its specificity, molecular pathways, and the broader
implications of its upstream regulatory activities. Traditional apoptosis-inducers, such as
chemotherapeutic agents, are often non-specific, affecting both cancerous and normal cells, leading to
significant side effects such as myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. In contrast, PAR-4
(1-6) acts through selective signaling mechanisms that exploit the dysregulated pathways that are
overactive in cancer cells, such as the downregulation of pro-survival Akt pathways and interference
with the nuclear translocation of NF-kB, a transcription factor typically upregulated in malignancies.
This specificity for tumor cells, not merely in inducing cell death but also inhibiting mechanisms that
resist apoptosis, underscores its potential advantages over conventional therapies. Additionally, as
this peptide intersects with p53 pathways—a key tumor suppressor protein—enhanced synergy is afforded,
especially in therapies where p53 is not mutated. Another advantage lies in its ability to synergize
with lower doses of other chemotherapeutic agents, thereby potentially lessening the required dosage and
associated toxicities. Furthermore, the exploration of PAR-4 in combination with emerging
immunotherapeutic strategies, like checkpoint inhibitors, presents opportunities for more comprehensive
antitumor responses through enhanced immunogenic cell death. Therefore, while promising for its
precision and potential therapeutic synergies, the transition of PAR-4 (1-6) into standard treatments
must surmount challenges intrinsic to innovating within anticancer therapies, ensuring its sustained
clinical benefit and safety.