Synonym |
PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) |
Species |
Mouse |
Protein Accession |
P97892 |
Purity |
Greater than 95% by SDS-PAGE |
Endotoxin Level |
<1.0 EU per 1 μg of protein |
Biological Activity |
Not specified |
Expression System |
E. coli |
Fusion Tag |
His tag |
Predicted Molecular Mass |
7.4 kDa |
Formulation |
Lyophilized from a 0.2 μm filtered solution in PBS |
Reconstitution |
Centrifuge the vial prior to opening. Reconstitute in water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/ml.
|
Storage & Stability |
Store at -20°C upon receipt, and -80°C for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
|
FAQ
What is PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) and how does it function in research?
PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) refers to a
peptide derived from the Prostate Apoptosis Response-4 (PAR-4) protein, focusing specifically on its
N-terminal region. In scientific research, PAR-4 is renowned for its role in inducing apoptosis,
particularly in cancer cells, while sparing normal cells. This makes it a subject of interest for
developing targeted cancer therapies. PAR-4 operates through multiple pathways to promote cell death,
including the modulation of apoptotic signals and interference with survival pathways within the cell.
One key mechanism is its interaction with other apoptotic proteins, enhancing the apoptotic signal in
stressed cells. Researchers have discovered that PAR-4 can be transported into cells where it
accumulates in the cytoplasm and can then translocate to the nucleus, a process seen as crucial for its
pro-apoptotic function.
The peptide PAR-4 (1-6) is particularly significant in research because
it represents the receptor-binding domain, which is critical for its functioning. By studying this
segment, researchers can better understand how PAR-4 interacts with cellular components to trigger
apoptosis. The effectiveness of PAR-4 in targeting cancer cells is linked to its ability to activate the
Fas receptor, a death receptor on the surface of cells, leading to the induction of apoptosis.
Furthermore, PAR-4 can work synergistically with other apoptotic agents to enhance apoptosis in cancer
cells. This offers a potential avenue for augmenting existing cancer treatments, using PAR-4 to make
cancer cells more susceptible to traditional therapies.
Understanding the molecular dynamics of
PAR-4 (1-6) in the mouse model is pivotal, as mice are often used as preliminary models for human
biology due to physiological similarities. Studying this peptide in mice allows researchers to validate
its apoptotic pathways and effects, laying the groundwork for eventual human application. Given these
features, PAR-4 and its derivatives represent promising tools for cancer research, providing insights
into novel therapeutic strategies that could revolutionize how we approach cancer treatment, focusing on
selectively inducing death in cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissues.
What are
the potential applications of PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) in cancer therapy?
The potential applications
of PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) in cancer therapy are vast and offer new avenues for developing targeted
treatments. A pivotal feature of this peptide is its ability to selectively target cancer cells, which
makes it an attractive candidate for use in cancer therapeutics. In contemporary cancer research,
efforts are heavily invested in finding ways to kill cancer cells effectively without causing
substantial harm to normal, healthy cells. PAR-4 (1-6) provides such an opportunity by leveraging its
inherent apoptotic properties.
One significant application in cancer therapy revolves around the
peptide's ability not only to initiate apoptosis but also to enhance the efficacy of existing cancer
treatments. For instance, chemotherapeutic agents often face the challenge of cancer cell resistance,
where cancer cells evolve mechanisms to evade apoptosis typically induced by these drugs. By integrating
PAR-4 (1-6) with conventional chemotherapy, researchers aim to overcome such resistance. The peptide can
sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents, thereby heightening the overall apoptotic effect and
improving the therapeutic outcome.
Further, the peptide's role in targeting drug-resistant cancer
cells can aid in the treatment of aggressive and recurrent forms of cancer such as prostate cancer,
ovarian cancer, and certain subtypes of breast cancer, which frequently develop resistance to standard
treatments. In such contexts, PAR-4 (1-6) shows promise as a standalone therapeutic agent, or
importantly, as an adjuvant therapy that could be used in combination with other treatments to improve
efficacy.
Beyond inducing cell death, there is potential for PAR-4 (1-6) to be utilized in
diagnostic applications. Its ability to differentiate between malignant and benign cells means that
derivatives of this peptide could potentially serve in identifying cancer cells in patients, allowing
for more accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment plans. Additionally, through its receptor-binding
domain, PAR-4 (1-6) could aid in imaging technologies to visualize tumor burdens and metastasis in
real-time within the body.
The ongoing research into PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) continues to unlock
understandings of its mechanisms and applications. The insights gained set the stage for human clinical
trials, which will be critical to establishing its safety profile and therapeutic efficacy in humans. If
successful, PAR-4 (1-6)-based therapies could represent a paradigm shift in how oncologists approach
cancer treatment, offering more targeted, effective, and safe therapeutic options for patients battling
various forms of cancer.
How does PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) synergize with existing cancer
treatments?
PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) exhibits a remarkable ability to synergize with existing cancer
treatments, leading to enhanced therapeutic outcomes. This synergistic potential is primarily derived
from its unique mode of action, which complements and amplifies the effects of conventional cancer
therapies. The understanding of how PAR-4 (1-6) interacts with established treatments is crucial for
developing combination therapies that are more effective than monotherapies alone.
One way PAR-4
(1-6) synergizes with traditional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy is through its modulatory
effects on apoptotic pathways. Chemotherapeutic agents generally work by inducing DNA damage in rapidly
dividing cells, which should lead to apoptosis. However, cancer cells often develop resistance
mechanisms, including the upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, thus diminishing chemotherapy’s
effectiveness. PAR-4 (1-6) counteracts this resistance by activating pro-apoptotic pathways and
inhibiting anti-apoptotic proteins, increasing the overall susceptibility of cancer cells to undergo
apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic agents.
In addition to chemotherapy, PAR-4 (1-6) also
shows significant potential when used in conjunction with radiation therapy. Radiation therapy aims to
destroy cancer cells by damaging their DNA with ionizing radiation. However, similar to chemotherapy,
resistance can occur. Studies indicate that PAR-4 (1-6) may enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy by
targeting the survival pathways that cancer cells exploit to resist radiation-induced apoptosis. This
dual-action not only ensures more effective cell death but may also permit reductions in the radiation
dose required, thereby minimizing the collateral damage to healthy tissues usually associated with
radiation therapy.
Furthermore, PAR-4 (1-6)'s molecular properties suggest potential synergy with
immunotherapies, which are increasingly critical in modern cancer treatment paradigms. Immunotherapies
work by stimulating the body's own immune system to attack cancer cells. PAR-4 (1-6) might enhance the
immune response by increasing the immunogenicity of cancer cells; as cancer cells are more prone to
apoptotic cell death, they release signals that can lead to a stronger immune attack. This interaction
highlights an innovative approach of integrating PAR-4 (1-6) with checkpoint inhibitors or cancer
vaccines.
An exciting frontier in oncology is the development of rationally designed combination
therapies that use biologically compatible agents to achieve synergistic effects, maximizing clinical
outcomes while minimizing adverse effects. The inclusion of PAR-4 (1-6) in such strategies holds the
promise of advancing personalized medicine, where treatments are tailored to the individual's tumor
biology, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of cancer interventions and improving patient quality of
life.
What are the advantages of using PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) in preclinical studies?
Using
PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) in preclinical studies presents numerous advantages that are crucial for the
advancement of cancer research and therapy. As a specific segment of the larger PAR-4 protein renowned
for its pro-apoptotic function, this peptide is highly valued for its precision and specificity in
research. One of the primary advantages is its ability to selectively induce apoptosis in cancerous
cells while leaving normal cells largely unaffected. This selectivity minimizes potential off-target
effects, a critical consideration in preclinical studies where preliminary safety and efficacy
parameters are assessed.
Another advantage relates to the biological relevance offered by using
mouse models when investigating the roles and efficacy of PAR-4 (1-6). Mice share significant
physiological and genetic similarities with humans, making them ideal for modeling human diseases,
especially cancer. The peptide-derived insights in murine models allow researchers to extrapolate data
more confidently toward human biology. These models are instrumental in evaluating the pharmacokinetics
(how the drug moves through the body) and pharmacodynamics (the effects of the drug on the body) of the
peptide, providing a comprehensive profile before progressing to clinical trials.
Moreover,
studying PAR-4 (1-6) in mice aids in the identification of potential side effects and the therapeutic
index - the range between effective doses and toxic doses. Understanding such parameters is essential in
drug development to ensure patient safety and treatment efficacy. Mouse studies also allow for the
exploration of the peptide's interactions with the immune system, which is crucial given the emerging
role of immunotherapies in cancer treatment. By analyzing such interactions in a controlled setting,
researchers can design and predict combination strategies that exploit PAR-4 (1-6)'s pro-apoptotic
abilities along with the host's immune responses.
The versatility of PAR-4 (1-6) in preclinical
studies extends to combination treatment approaches. Using mouse models, researchers can investigate the
synergistic effects of PAR-4 (1-6) with existing cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, and
novel small molecules. This synergy can enhance the therapeutic effectiveness and potentially reduce
required dosages of co-administered drugs, thereby diminishing their associated
toxicities.
Furthermore, the employment of PAR-4 (1-6) in preclinical models provides a platform
for the discovery and development of biomarkers that can predict treatment response and patient
prognosis. With the trend toward personalized cancer treatment, utilizing indicative biomarkers allows
for the tailoring of therapeutic regimens based on an individual's molecular and genetic profile,
optimizing efficacy and minimizing unnecessary treatments.
Overall, the strategic use of PAR-4
(1-6) (mouse) in preclinical studies underscores a significant step forward in cancer research, where
elucidation of molecular mechanisms and pathways can lead to groundbreaking therapies. With its
specificity, physiological relevance, and versatility, PAR-4 (1-6) stands out as a powerful tool in the
ongoing battle against cancer, offering hope for future therapeutic advancements.
Are there
limitations to using PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse) in cancer research?
While the use of PAR-4 (1-6) (mouse)
presents profound advantages in cancer research, several limitations must be acknowledged to fully
appreciate its role and potential in scientific studies. One primary limitation is the inherent
differences in biological systems, even among closely related species like humans and mice. Although
mice provide a valuable model due to physiological similarities, they are not perfect analogs for human
disease. The behavior of PAR-4 (1-6) in mouse models may not fully replicate its behavior in humans due
to variations in immune responses, cellular environments, and gene expression patterns. These
differences necessitate cautious interpretation of results and highlight the need for subsequent
validation in human cell lines and clinical trials.
Furthermore, the specificity of PAR-4 (1-6)
can be a double-edged sword. While its selectivity towards cancer cells is a significant advantage, it
also poses a challenge in identifying its complete mechanism of action and potential off-target effects
that could arise in a complex human physiological system. Off-target effects or unexpected interactions
with other cellular proteins may lead to unforeseen consequences, affecting the translatability of
preclinical findings to human treatments.
In addition, the reliance on mouse models means that
researchers have to deal with the limitation of scaling doses and delivery methods used in the tests.
The dosage and method of delivering PAR-4 (1-6) that is effective and safe in mice may not have the same
profile in humans due to differences in metabolism, body size, and distribution pathways. Addressing
these differences can be challenging and involves complex pharmacological adjustments to ensure that
what works in a mouse model will be equally effective in human applications.
Another limitation
is the potential variability in the efficacy of PAR-4 (1-6) across different cancer types and genetic
backgrounds. Cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, and responses to therapeutic agents can vary
significantly between individuals and tumor types. There is a need for extensive research to map the
peptide's activity across diverse cancer models, understanding its behavior in different tumor
microenvironments, and identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from treatments involving
PAR-4 (1-6). This endeavor is complex and requires significant resources and time.
Lastly, the
current focus on preclinical benefits means that real-world clinical factors such as cost,
accessibility, and long-term effects have yet to be thoroughly evaluated. The transition from bench to
bedside involves addressing not only the biological efficacy of PAR-4 (1-6) but also its feasibility,
including manufacturing challenges, regulatory approvals, and integration into existing healthcare
frameworks.
Despite these limitations, research into PAR-4 (1-6) remains invaluable. By being
mindful of these constraints, researchers can design studies that systematically address these
challenges, advancing the understanding of this promising peptide and its potential utilization in
cancer therapeutics, ultimately contributing to the quest for more effective, targeted, and safe cancer
treatments.